Introduction
I often get asked about aggressive mutual funds, especially those offered by Fidelity. Investors want growth, but they also fear volatility. Aggressive Fidelity mutual funds sit at the intersection of these two forces. They aim for high returns by taking on more risk, often investing in volatile sectors like technology, emerging markets, or small-cap stocks.
Table of Contents
What Are Aggressive Mutual Funds?
Aggressive mutual funds prioritize capital appreciation over income or stability. They typically:
- Invest in high-growth sectors (tech, biotech, emerging markets)
- Have higher expense ratios due to active management
- Experience greater volatility than index funds or bond funds
Fidelity offers several aggressive funds, such as:
- Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX)
- Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX)
- Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX)
These funds often outperform in bull markets but suffer deeper losses during downturns.
Risk vs. Reward: The Math Behind Aggressive Funds
To understand whether an aggressive fund is worth it, we need to quantify risk and reward. One common measure is the Sharpe Ratio, which adjusts returns for risk:
Sharpe\ Ratio = \frac{R_p - R_f}{\sigma_p}Where:
- R_p = Portfolio return
- R_f = Risk-free rate (e.g., 10-year Treasury yield)
- \sigma_p = Standard deviation of portfolio returns
Example:
Suppose FBGRX has an annual return of 12%, the risk-free rate is 2%, and its standard deviation is 18%. The Sharpe Ratio would be:
A higher Sharpe Ratio means better risk-adjusted returns. Compare this to a conservative fund with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.8—despite lower absolute returns, it may be more efficient.
Comparing Aggressive vs. Conservative Funds
Fund Type | Avg. Annual Return | Standard Deviation | Sharpe Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Aggressive Growth | 12% | 18% | 0.56 |
Conservative Blend | 7% | 8% | 0.80 |
This table shows that while aggressive funds may offer higher returns, they come with greater volatility.
Who Should Invest in Aggressive Fidelity Funds?
Not everyone should chase high-growth funds. They suit:
- Young Investors – With decades until retirement, they can recover from downturns.
- High-Risk Tolerance Individuals – Those who won’t panic-sell during a 20% drop.
- Supplemental Portfolios – Investors who already have a stable core portfolio.
If you’re nearing retirement or need stable income, conservative funds or bonds may be better.
Historical Performance: Case Studies
Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX)
- 10-Year Avg. Return: 14.2%
- Worst Year: -22% (2008)
- Best Year: +37% (2013)
This fund thrives in growth markets but suffers in recessions.
Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX)
- Heavily weighted in tech stocks (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia)
- 5-Year Return: 18.5%
- 2022 Drawdown: -33%
Tech-heavy funds like FOCPX can skyrocket but also crash hard.
Tax Considerations
Aggressive funds often generate higher capital gains due to frequent trading. This can lead to:
- Short-term capital gains (taxed as ordinary income)
- Higher tax bills compared to index funds
Example:
If you earn $10,000 in short-term gains and fall in the 24% tax bracket, you owe $2,400 in taxes. Long-term gains would be taxed at 15%, saving you $900.
Alternatives to Aggressive Funds
If volatility concerns you, consider:
- Index Funds – Lower fees, broader diversification (e.g., Fidelity 500 Index – FXAIX)
- Target-Date Funds – Automatically adjust risk as you near retirement
- Sector ETFs – More control over exposure (e.g., XLK for tech)
Final Thoughts
Aggressive Fidelity mutual funds can supercharge returns but require a strong stomach. They work best as part of a diversified portfolio, not as a standalone strategy. Before investing, assess your risk tolerance, time horizon, and tax situation.