25 largest mutual funds

25 Largest Mutual Funds: What They Are and Why They Matter

When I think about mutual funds, size often catches my attention. The largest mutual funds attract billions of dollars because many investors trust them. But size isn’t everything. Still, understanding the biggest funds helps me gauge market trends and assess the most popular investment vehicles.

What Does “Largest Mutual Fund” Mean?

The “largest” mutual funds are typically measured by their total assets under management. That’s the total market value of all shares investors hold in the fund.

Why does size matter?

  • Liquidity: Larger funds often have easier liquidity.
  • Stability: Big funds tend to be more stable during market volatility.
  • Cost Efficiency: Economies of scale can lower expense ratios.
  • Market Impact: Very large funds can influence markets.

But large size can sometimes lead to challenges like difficulty in managing smaller niche opportunities or higher transaction costs.

Table: 25 Largest Mutual Funds by Assets Under Management (AUM)

Fund NameCategoryAssets Under Management (Billions USD)Expense RatioInception YearFund Manager(s)
Vanguard 500 Index Fund (VFIAX)Large Blend7500.04%1976Index Fund
Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX)Large Blend3200.015%1988Index Fund
Vanguard Total Stock Market (VTSAX)Large Blend3000.04%1992Index Fund
American Funds Growth Fund of America (AGTHX)Large Growth1100.65%1973Multi-manager
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth (TRBCX)Large Growth1100.69%1993Larry Puglia
Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX)Large Growth1300.85%1967Will Danoff
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund (DODGX)Large Value700.52%1965Multiple
Vanguard Wellington Fund (VWELX)Balanced600.25%1929Index + Active
American Funds Capital Income Builder (CAIBX)Balanced300.57%1973Multi-manager
Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX)Large Blend200.75%1977Jeffrey Feingold
Vanguard Total Bond Market (VBTLX)Intermediate-Term Bond1800.05%1986Index Fund
PIMCO Total Return Fund (PTTRX)Intermediate-Term Bond1000.85%1987Bill Gross (former)
T. Rowe Price Equity Income (PRFDX)Large Value500.64%1985Ron O’Hanley
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX)Mid-Cap Growth300.85%1978Steven Wymer
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX)Large Blend350.22%1990Janet Brown
American Funds New Perspective Fund (ANWPX)World Growth800.64%1973Multi-manager
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX)Large Growth350.69%1987Larry Puglia
Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX)Large Growth250.82%1963Will Danoff
Vanguard Health Care Fund (VGHCX)Sector – Health400.35%1984Jean Hynes
Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX)Sector – Tech200.70%1983Jeffrey Feingold
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Fund (VISGX)Small Growth150.28%1991Index Fund
American Funds Investment Company of America (AIVSX)Large Blend900.62%1934Multi-manager
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX)Small Value100.87%1989William Stromberg
Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX)Large Growth200.84%1983Will Danoff
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund (VBIAX)Balanced250.07%1987Index Fund

Why These Funds Became So Large

Some reasons these funds have grown massive include:

  • Indexing: Vanguard and Fidelity index funds dominate with ultra-low fees attracting huge inflows.
  • Longevity: Funds like the American Funds and Fidelity Contrafund have decades of track record.
  • Strong Branding: Vanguard’s reputation for low fees, American Funds for active management.
  • Consistent Performance: Many funds have outperformed peers and retained investors.

Impact of Size on Fund Performance

Large size can be a double-edged sword. On the positive side, large funds often benefit from:

  • Lower expense ratios due to economies of scale.
  • Better liquidity for investors.
  • Stability during volatile markets.

However, very large funds sometimes face:

  • Difficulty in nimble investing, especially for small or mid-cap stocks.
  • Potential market impact when making trades.

When a fund grows huge, managers may shift toward large-cap stocks to deploy assets effectively.

Expense Ratios and Their Effect on Returns

Expense ratios reduce your net returns. Consider two funds:

Fund NameGross ReturnExpense RatioNet Return (Approximate)
Fund A10.5%0.85%9.65%
Fund B10.2%0.10%10.1%

Over time, this difference compounds significantly.

Example Calculation: Effect of Expense Ratio on $100,000 Over 20 Years

Let’s calculate the future value of $100,000 invested at 10.5% gross return with 0.85% fees vs. 10.2% gross return with 0.10% fees:

\text{Net return Fund A} = 10.5% - 0.85% = 9.65%

\text{Net return Fund B} = 10.2% - 0.10% = 10.1%

Using the future value formula:

FV = P \times (1 + r)^n

For Fund A:

FV_A = 100,000 \times (1 + 0.0965)^{20} = 100,000 \times 6.63 = 663,000

For Fund B:

FV_B = 100,000 \times (1 + 0.101)^{20} = 100,000 \times 6.73 = 673,000

That’s a $10,000 difference over 20 years from just a 0.75% fee difference.

Manager Tenure and Its Importance

I look at how long the fund managers have been running the fund. Longer tenures usually signal stability and consistent strategy.

For example, Will Danoff has managed Fidelity Contrafund since 1990, which partly explains its sustained success.

How to Use This List

This list can help you:

  • Identify popular funds with a long history and large investor base.
  • Compare fees and strategies among major funds.
  • Understand where investors are putting money in the US market.
  • Consider if a fund’s size matches your investment goals and style.

Final Thoughts

The largest mutual funds offer many benefits — low costs, liquidity, and proven track records. But they also may have limits due to size constraints.

I recommend you balance size with your personal needs and preferences. Review fees, management, and strategy before investing.

Scroll to Top